Designing Trauma-Informed Mediation Processes for Family Violence Cases
- Jana de Waal

- Sep 9, 2024
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 23
In Alberta, the family law landscape is shifting significantly. With mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) now required before pursuing family court claims, mediation has become a crucial step in resolving disputes. However, this new mandate presents challenges, particularly for victims of family violence who must face their abuser in mediation settings. Ensuring that mediators are equipped to handle such cases sensitively and effectively is paramount to achieving fair and safe outcomes.
Understanding Mediation and Family Violence
Mediation involves a neutral third party helping disputants reach a mutually acceptable resolution. It's designed to foster open communication and cooperation without the adversarial nature of court proceedings. For family law matters, mediation can be particularly beneficial as it encourages amicable resolutions and is generally faster than court processes.
However, in cases involving family violence, mediation can be fraught with complications. Family violence includes physical, emotional, psychological, and financial abuse, and can escalate post-separation, making mediation risky. Abusers might use the process to further manipulate or control their victims, undermining the fairness of the mediation and potentially re-traumatizing the victim.
The Importance of Trauma-Informed Mediation
Trauma-informed mediation is essential for cases involving family violence. A trauma-informed mediator understands the profound impact of trauma on an individual's well-being and adjusts their approach to prevent re-traumatization. Trauma affects individuals uniquely, often resulting in long-term emotional and psychological challenges. Mediators who are not trained in trauma may fail to recognize these issues, leading to a mediation process that may exacerbate the victim’s trauma.
Designing a Trauma-Informed Mediation Process
To ensure that mediation is safe and effective for victims of family violence, mediators must implement a structured trauma-informed approach:
Pre-Mediation Screening: Conduct thorough pre-mediation screening to identify signs of family violence. This involves asking targeted questions about decision-making, conflict resolution, and any history of violence or intimidation. This step helps to understand
Virtual Mediation: When family violence is present, consider using virtual platforms for mediation. This setup reduces the risk of intimidation and allows mediators to control the environment more effectively. Features like virtual breakout rooms and mute functions can prevent direct confrontations and provide a safer space for the victim.
Caucus/Shuttle Mediation: Begin mediation with shuttle or caucus mediation, where parties are separated and communicate through the mediator. This approach minimizes direct interaction between the victim and the abuser, reducing the potential for further intimidation or manipulation.
Family Violence Support Person: For severe cases, allow the victim to have a qualified family violence support person present. This person provides emotional support without participating directly in the mediation, helping the victim feel more secure and supported.
Regulated Breaks: Implement regular breaks during mediation sessions to give parties time to process emotions and de-escalate tensions. Breaks also provide opportunities for the mediator to check in with each party and address any immediate concerns or discomfort.
Building Trust and Ensuring Participation: Establish trust at the beginning of the mediation by setting clear ground rules and explaining the mediation process. Ensure that both parties have equal opportunities to speak and that their contributions are valued. Continually monitor for signs of power imbalances and adjust the mediation process as needed.
Follow-Up: After mediation, follow up with the parties to evaluate the effectiveness of the resolution and address any ongoing issues. This ensures that the agreement is practical and continues to meet the needs of both parties, especially in evolving family dynamics.
Conclusion
Effective mediation in family violence cases requires a trauma-informed approach that prioritizes safety and supports victims' needs. By incorporating thorough pre-screening, utilizing virtual platforms, employing caucus mediation, involving support persons, and ensuring regular breaks, mediators can create a safer environment for all parties. Trauma-informed practices not only help avoid re-traumatization but also contribute to more successful and equitable resolutions. Mediators who are aware of and responsive to the effects of trauma can better facilitate mediation processes that genuinely address and resolve the issues at hand.




Comments